Ten Talking Points of Twenty Tixteen

December 20, 2016 by Terry Saunders

The season is over and whilst we all wait for the pre-season testing to begin (in about 20 mins I think) we at FF1S Towers will try to unpick what the fuck just happened.

Tonight (20th Dec - merry Xmas) we will be recording our end of season review podcast and have distilled the 2016 season into ten talking points and we need YOUR help.

What are your thoughts on each or any of these - how have they affected the season?

Comments below, tweet us @forf1sake, email us at wrong@ff1s.com or message/comment on our facebook - forf1ssake.

1 - Mercedes makes it look easy

They came, they saw, they conquered. One quit. Did they make domination fun?

2 - Red Bull Family Feuds

Daniil Kvyat got the boot, MAx Verstappen got the rise. Daniel Ricciardo tried desperately to get to people's feet and Carlos Sainz was left alone. Was this soap opera enough to forget 2015?

3 - Ferrari Fucks it

The marquee Formula One team, constantly doing everything to be bloody awful?

4 - Haaaaaaaaaaaas not done badly actually

A new team that isn't 17 seconds off the pace for three years? WTF?

5 - Rulezzz are meant to be changed constantly

This year we've had a terrible quali re-jig, a definite radio ban that became an un-ban, new incredibly-soft tyres. Have any of these actually spiced up the racing?

6 - Rookies

Ocon, Wehrlein, Palmer, Harianto and StoffelROFL all stepped into a F1 racecar for the first time - who did best?

7 - Retirements

An ever changing list of grandees who have (maybe) left the sport - Out of Button, Rosberg and Massa, who has gone with most dignity, and who's legacy will be strongest?

8 - FF1S Sports Driver Personality of the Year Award

Our inaugral prize, who should win the best driver personailty sports award?

9 - Race of the year and Switch-off of the year

Which race will you remember, and which have you already forgotten?

10 - Nico Rosberg RIP

What do you think of this man's F1 career?

Lewis Hamilton dreams in vain of reliability in his car and in the knees of his jeans. (pic: Mercedes)

What if?

October 17, 2016 by Phill Tromans

Lewis Hamilton has not had the best of luck thus far in 2016. So what might have happened if both Mercedes cars had excellent reliability throughout the season?

We looked at each race weekend, and where Hamilton or Rosberg had technical issues, we’ve taken an educated guess at what the result would have been should those issues have not arisen. Only reliability problems have been considered – results affected by crashes or other incidents have been ignored, because science.

Australia

Nico wins, Hamilton second at Albert Park (Pic: Mercedes)

Hamilton had a bad start from pole and could only get back to second. Rosberg won from second on the grid. No reliability issues, therefore no change to the result.

Result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Possible result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Actual points: HAM 18, ROS 25

Possible points: HAM 18, ROS 25

Bahrain

Rosberg had a good start, but Hamilton got hit by Bottas at the first corner and dropped back, climbed back to third. This was undoubtedly unlucky for Lewis, but nothing to do with reliability.

Result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Possible result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Actual points: HAM 33, ROS 50

Possible points: HAM 33, ROS 50

China

Rosberg races away from pole, Hamilton tries to pass a Manor in the background. (Pic: Mercedes)

Hamilton had tech problems in practice and didn’t taking part in qualify. He started at the back of the grid, but recovered to seventh. Rosberg won.

Reliability issues for Lewis meant he was at a huge disadvantage in this race. But he has had the most wins around this track, so it’s not unreasonable to suggest he could have won if his car was working. Rosberg would likely have been second.

Result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 2

Actual points: HAM 39, ROS 75

Possible points: HAM 58, ROS 68

Russia

Hamilton had engine issues in Q3 again, which meant he started 10th and recovered to second. Lewis was fastest in P2 and P3, and Q1, while Rosberg was fastest in P1 and Q2.

Let’s give Hamilton the benefit of the doubt and say that he would have taken pole and won the race, although it’s worth noting that his poor starts mean it could easily have been another Rosberg win anyway.

Result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 2

Actual points: HAM 57, ROS 100

Possible points: HAM 83, ROS 86

Spain

Shortly before the crash. (Pic: Mercedes)

Both Mercs took each other out, which was nothing to do with reliability. No points to either.

Result: HAM DNF, ROS DNF

Possible result: HAM DNF, ROS DNF

Actual points: HAM 57, ROS 100

Possible points: HAM 83, ROS 86

Monaco

Hamilton had engine issues in qualifying but still won the race and was faster than Rosberg all weekend. Rosberg was rubbish in the race and finished seventh, but that wasn’t to do with reliability.

Result: HAM 1, ROS 7

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 7

Actual points: HAM 82, ROS 106

Possible points: HAM 108, ROS 92

Canada

Seconds before Rosberg was squeezed off and wrecked his race. (Pic: Mercedes)

Hamilton won and was fast all weekend. Rosberg got squeezed at the start and dropped back, finishing fifth after suffering from a puncture and spinning. Unfortunate, but not reliability related.

Result: HAM 1, ROS 5

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 5

Actual points: HAM 107, ROS 116

Possible points: HAM 133, ROS 102

Europe

Hamilton crashed all over the place in quali and started in 10th, with Rosberg on pole. Nico went on to win the race. Lewis had engine issues and, due to the radio rules, the team couldn’t tell him how to fix them.

Quali aside, Hamilton was quick all weekend, so let’s be generous and say he could have recovered to second, rather than fifth, if the car had been good.

Result: HAM 5, ROS 1

Possible result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Actual points: HAM 117, ROS 141

Possible points: HAM 151, ROS 127

Austria

Champagne and points for Lewis in Spielberg. (Pic: Mercedes)

Hamilton won, Rosberg was fourth after a silly overtaking attempt on Lewis towards the end. No reliability issues, although Rosberg had changed his gearbox after crashing in practice.

Result: HAM 1, ROS 4

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 4

Actual points: HAM 142, ROS 153

Possible points: HAM 176, ROS 139

Great Britain

Silverstone was Lewis' turn to go crowdsurfing. (Pic: Mercedes)

Hamilton won from pole. Rosberg had a water leak in P2, which meant no running, but didn’t look like being fastest anyway. It’s hard to see a different result than Lewis first, Rosberg third.

UPDATE: As someone on Twitter pointed out, Rosberg was demoted to third after a penalty for breaking radio rules. But that exchange only happened because he was having gearbox issues. Had those not happened, he wouldn't have had a penalty, so should probably finished second. We've updated the possible points accordingly.

Result: HAM 1, ROS 3

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 2

Actual points: HAM 168, ROS 167

Possible points: HAM 201, ROS 157

Hungary

A straight fight with no reliability problems. Hamilton won, Rosberg was second.

Result: HAM 1, ROS 2

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 2

Actual points: HAM 192, ROS 186

Possible points: HAM 226, ROS 175

Germany

Hamilton won and Rosberg was fourth after terrible start and a penalty for his incident with Verstappen

Result: HAM 1, ROS 4

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 4

Actual points: HAM 217, ROS 198

Possible points: HAM 251, ROS 187

Belgium

Hamilton took all his engine penalties and started at the back of the grid, yet still finished third. If he hadn’t had engine penalties and started up the front, his super quick pace around here should have given him the win.

Result: HAM 3, ROS 1

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 2

Actual points: HAM 232, ROS 223

Possible points: HAM 276, ROS 205

Italy

Rosberg wins, although Ham's still smiling. For now. (Pic: Mercedes)

Although he was super quick, a lousy start cost Hamilton the race. He was second while Rosberg took the win, but it was nothing to do with reliability.

Result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Possible result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Actual points: HAM 250, ROS 248

Possible points: HAM 294, ROS 230

Singapore

Hamilton congratulates Rosberg, or possibly tries to flick his ear. (Pic: Mercedes)

Hamilton had loads of reliability issues in practice, which limited his setup time. Rosberg took the win and was superb all weekend. With smooth practice, Lewis could conceivably have gotten second instead of third, but it’s difficult to see anything other than a Nico win.

Result: HAM 3, ROS 1

Possible result: HAM 2, ROS 1

Actual points: HAM 265, ROS 273

Possible points: HAM 312, ROS 255

Malaysia

"This car is more reliable than my race car. Toto, I want this car for the next race please." (Pic: Mercedes)

An engine failure cost Hamilton an easy win. Rosberg was fourth after being hit by Vettel at the start, which is an unfortunate incident but not reliability related. You’d have to say that Lewis lost a certain victory here.

Result: HAM DNF, ROS 4

Possible result: HAM 1, ROS 5

Actual points: HAM 265, ROS 288

Possible points: HAM 337, ROS 265

Japan

Hamilton was out of sorts and had a bad start, while Rosberg won. No reliability woes. Could Hamilton have been more on form if he was way ahead in the points? Maybe, but that’s stretching the concept a bit.

Result: HAM 3, ROS 1

Possible result: HAM 3, ROS 1

Actual points: HAM 280, ROS 313

Possible points: HAM 352, ROS 290

Conclusion

While Lewis has been guilty of underperforming at certain races, it seems pretty clear that his car's reliabilty has dramatically affected his chances of winning the 2016 title. Heading to Austin, Hamilton has to aim for wins in the remaining four races, and hope that Rosberg has issues of his own if he has any chance of retaining his crown.

This story was updated after publication, reflecting the likelihood that Rosberg would have probably finished second at Silverstone if he had not had gearbox issues that resulted in a penalty for an illegal radio coversation. It means Rosberg's possible points score is now three higher than originally.

11 Ways Liberty Media Can Save F1

September 08, 2016 by Terry Saunders in state of f1

Liberty Media might leave everything as is and continue to skim off the money from the top, but reports seems to point to them doing something different. So, if Liberty (and its boss, the dad from Frasier) are reading, here is my idle wishlist in a ten point plan to change F1.

State of F1: 2016 pre-season

March 18, 2016 by Terry Saunders in state of f1

We head into the 2016 season with a tangible lack of excitement and the general consensus is that that the general consensus will remain the same, Ferrari are closer to Mercedes, but not by enough. McLaren will be better, but not by enough and Sauber will be Sauber, which is not enough.

Express your interest in our engine

November 20, 2015 by Terry Saunders in engines

The FIA have made a mistake, or at least they've made another in a series of mistakes.

They've really screwed up the engines; you know, the Formula bit of Formula 1. After forcing all the teams and manufacturers to throw the old V8s in a skip they mandated a new V6 turbo fancy-wancy formula where the engines waste less energy and use electric and are generally fantastic.

They really are; they're amazing feats of technology that make great whizzy-whiny noises and have a thermal efficiency of 45 percent which, if you understood what that means (we don't), is apparently fantastic.

Not that you'd know this. In between harping on about road safety and pointedly not talking about commercial rights, the message that F1 has a groundbreaking engine is lost, even more so now that they have relented to possibly having a new (old) cheap (expensive) powertrain (engine) to help the poorer teams (cough, Red Bull) from 2017 onwards.

Yes, the modern engines have screwed up because they are stupidly complicated and the manufacturers have whoppingly overcharged what they thought they would cost. "Sorry, Frank, looks like your protection money will be a bit more this month."

As the F1 teams have proved time and time again, if you leave stuff up to them they will screw it up. So now we are in a position where the hard work is being undone to appease the team who did their best to break up any unity so that they can make their own (cough, unbranded Renault) engine with electric bits on the top and yet plead poverty as the reason.

So, with stupidly short notice for any real engine manufacturer to get a proposal in place, the FIA has rushed through an Expression of Interest for the new engines.

One that can only reasonably be expected to be filled by the Renault/Red Bull/Ilmor monster...

...and FF1s.

That's right, we have managed to get hold of the documents

Using some Watergate-esque journalistic sleuthing...

..we now have access to the almost masonic like complexity of documentation that tracks the entire murky process of the inner workings of the FIA (a PDF and and excel spreadsheet.)

now we need your help with this

We have uploaded these documents to Google Docs HERE and HERE and this is where we need you. Make yourself a column in the spreadsheet or pick yourself a colour in the doc and write in your best answers. You can either show your engineering chops and demonstrate your deep understanding of engines, or like us you can go for really silly answers.

On Sunday we'll pick the best and yes, we will really submit this.

Let's hope we don't actually win...

FFeS: Could it ever be that e>1?

November 11, 2015 by Terry Saunders in review

As the rain drained away from the Circuit of the Americas and another F1 championship was all wrapped up, on the other side of the world there was another season just beginning. One where it might not be such a good idea to drive in the wet. Formula E (uppercase E, like ecstasy, number or the vitamin) had its first ePrix (lower case e like -mail and -ticket, but the e stands for electric, not electronic. I think) in Beijing.

Nigel Mansell and "The Project"

October 21, 2015 by Terry Saunders in nostalgia

LORD SIR KING OBE WORLD CHAMPION AND LION NIGEL MANSELL ACTUALLY MADE AN APPEARANCE ON FF1S THIS WEEK. I WAS (COMPLETELY CORRECTLY) AGGRIEVED THAT PHILL DIDN'T ASK HIM ABOUT MY "PROJECT". HERE'S A LITTLE BACKGROUND...